<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Marketing For Search</title>
	<link>http://marketingforsearch.com</link>
	<description>Search Engine Marketing tips for the do it yourself webmaster!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on What does your PR mean? by coolsitez</title>
		<link>http://marketingforsearch.com/pr/what-does-your-pr-mean/#comment-7</link>
		<author>coolsitez</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketingforsearch.com/pr/what-does-your-pr-mean/#comment-7</guid>
					<description>I agree with Mike somewhat. But I would consider PR to be one of the most important factors. Normally, people simply use Google toolbar to check PR, hoping it's accurate and current, and then decide if the price for the link is worth or not.

The way I like to check directories' PR is more based on how they can grow and have potential in the future. So, I don't just see the current PR and decide if I should buy a link or not. I would like to see or try to see their potential by checking on their backlinks.

So, ultimately I am more looking at their backlinks rather than PR when deciding the directory's value. The current PR doesn't tell you much as it can be dropped in the next Google update, so if you think link building is like an investment, I think you want to check on the future rather than the current.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mike somewhat. But I would consider PR to be one of the most important factors. Normally, people simply use Google toolbar to check PR, hoping it&#8217;s accurate and current, and then decide if the price for the link is worth or not.</p>
<p>The way I like to check directories&#8217; PR is more based on how they can grow and have potential in the future. So, I don&#8217;t just see the current PR and decide if I should buy a link or not. I would like to see or try to see their potential by checking on their backlinks.</p>
<p>So, ultimately I am more looking at their backlinks rather than PR when deciding the directory&#8217;s value. The current PR doesn&#8217;t tell you much as it can be dropped in the next Google update, so if you think link building is like an investment, I think you want to check on the future rather than the current.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What does your PR mean? by Michael Dammann</title>
		<link>http://marketingforsearch.com/pr/what-does-your-pr-mean/#comment-5</link>
		<author>Michael Dammann</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketingforsearch.com/pr/what-does-your-pr-mean/#comment-5</guid>
					<description>Personally I do not go by PR at all. I look at the quality. I have seen far too many websites with high PR get banned and drag others down with it, and far too many brandnew ones shoot up from 0 to 5, 6 or even 7.
So my advice is to ignore PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I do not go by PR at all. I look at the quality. I have seen far too many websites with high PR get banned and drag others down with it, and far too many brandnew ones shoot up from 0 to 5, 6 or even 7.<br />
So my advice is to ignore PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Build links with Free and Paid Directories by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://marketingforsearch.com/link-building/build-links-with-free-and-paid-directories/#comment-3</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketingforsearch.com/link-building/build-links-with-free-and-paid-directories/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>manual submission services are going to be the best compared to any software that you might use.  In regards to the quality and effectiveness of the two companies listed, there are really none better.  The provide you a quality list for the do it yourselfers or provide solid manual submissions services for people that do not have time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>manual submission services are going to be the best compared to any software that you might use.  In regards to the quality and effectiveness of the two companies listed, there are really none better.  The provide you a quality list for the do it yourselfers or provide solid manual submissions services for people that do not have time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Build links with Free and Paid Directories by netfreez</title>
		<link>http://marketingforsearch.com/link-building/build-links-with-free-and-paid-directories/#comment-2</link>
		<author>netfreez</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketingforsearch.com/link-building/build-links-with-free-and-paid-directories/#comment-2</guid>
					<description>How affective are the manual submission services offered by either of the companies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How affective are the manual submission services offered by either of the companies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
